Mr. Limpy Small - 3.5" Soft Packer - RodeoH
Mr. Limpy Small - 3.5" Soft Packer - RodeoH
Mr. Limpy Small - 3.5" Soft Packer - RodeoH

The Mr. Limpy Small is the ultimate in realistic detailing at a super affordable price. Made of a real-to-the-touch SuperSkin material it has a life-like squishy texture and matte finish.

Length: 3.5 inches (8.9 cm)

How to Care for Your Soft Packer: Wash with soap and water and allow to air dry. Dust with cornstarch to restore matte finish.

Dimensions: 11.6 cm / 4.6 inches wide, 3.3 cm / 1.3 inches tall

Fleshlight

Mr. Limpy Small - 3.5" Soft Packer

Sale price$15.95
Color:Mr. Limpy Caramel
Quantity:
average rating 4.9 out of 5
Based on 11 reviews
  • 5 Stars
    10 Reviews
  • 4 Stars
    1 Review
  • 3 Stars
    0 Reviews
  • 2 Stars
    0 Reviews
  • 1 Star
    0 Reviews
100% of reviewers would recommend this product to a friend
Firmness
Rated -1 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Soft, 0 is Medium and 2 is Firm
Design
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Quality
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Overall
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
11 Reviews
Reviewed by Jay
I recommend this product
Rated 5 out of 5
Review posted

Good

I bought this packer about a week and a half ago, and I've decided that I've spent enough time with it at this point to give it a review. I bought the Flesh color, and I find that even that size gives me quite an impressive bulge. It definitely isn't small despite the name - it is perfectly average and at times, I even feel like it looks a little big, depending on the fit of my pants. What people don't seem to realize is that most men aren't very large when they're flaccid - of course, everyone's body is different. I am very happy with the shape of the packer as well, as it looks very natural in my underwear. The packer is also detailed, which I did not expect from the product image. I don't have a frame of reference for whether it feels like the real thing if someone were to, say, cup or squeeze it, but it seems to me like it isn't too firm. I don't know what its longevity will be, but at its price point I would be satisfied if I had to replace it after a couple of months. I would happily make this purchase again.

Loading...
Firmness
Rated -2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Soft, 0 is Medium and 2 is Firm
Design
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Quality
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Overall
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Was this helpful?
Reviewed by Jean
I recommend this product
Rated 4 out of 5
Review posted

Good enough.

This works well as a packer. I got the smallest size and was not disappointed. People who are beginning should get the smaller size to start out with. Very realistic look and feel (sorta), soft and comfortable.

Loading...
Firmness
Rated -2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Soft, 0 is Medium and 2 is Firm
Design
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Quality
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Overall
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Was this helpful?
Reviewed by LB
I recommend this product
Rated 5 out of 5
Review posted

Strongly recommended for a first packer!

Now some people say the balls are too big but honestly everything about this packer is perfect I think. I pack laying it down to one side and it looks perfect. I also ordered the size bigger.... as every other review I’ve read said too - the balls are way too small on the bigger one. It’s weird and top heavy. Anyway, I absolutely LOVE this packer and the price is great with a tremendous value. And it has a lot of detail for a cheap packer.

Loading...
Firmness
Rated -2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Soft, 0 is Medium and 2 is Firm
Design
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Quality
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Overall
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Was this helpful?
Reviewed by Ang
I recommend this product
Rated 5 out of 5
Review posted

Great for short guys.

As a short trans* guy, I found this packer to be exactly the size I was looking for. In addition, it's the exact squishiness that a cis guy's "junk" would be ... it's pretty much comfortable for all-day wear and looks natural when lounging around, working, wandering the mall, etc. When properly cared for, it's durable and will last a good while.

Loading...
Firmness
Rated -2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Soft, 0 is Medium and 2 is Firm
Design
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Quality
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Overall
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Was this helpful?
Reviewed by Skylar
I recommend this product
Rated 5 out of 5
Review posted

10/10 would recommend.

I got the small first, and it's way too big to pack realistically. Then I got the XS, and it is the perfect size for packing. I love it! It gives enough of a bulge to look realistic in underwear and make me feel great without looking like I'm sporting a hard on. I use it with pocket boxer briefs and it stays in place even when running.

Loading...
Firmness
Rated -2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Soft, 0 is Medium and 2 is Firm
Design
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Quality
Rated 0 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Overall
Rated 1 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Was this helpful?