Rated 5.0 out of 5
Based on 1 review

Shift 9" Boxer Packer Underwear - Succulents Skulls White

$14.99

In stock - Ready to be shipped

Estimated delivery between June 08 and June 10. Order within .

Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9 Shift 9
Size

Upgrade your everyday with SHIFT by RodeoH, a collection of packer underwear designed for style, comfort, and inclusivity. Made with a silky cotton blend and super-soft satin waistband, these boxer shorts feel as good as they look.

The side-loading interior pocket is perfect for XS–Medium soft packers, making it a discreet, functional choice for daily wear. The Shift 9" Boxer features a mid-rise fit and a longer leg length ideal for layering under any outfit.

Features:

  • 95% breathable cotton, 5% spandex for stretch
  • Machine wash cold, tumble dry low
  • Note: O-ring not included
  • Pocket fits XS–Medium packers
  • 9" inseam
Shift 9" Boxer Packer Underwear - Succulents Skulls White - RodeoH

Shift 9" Boxer Packer Underwear - Succulents Skulls White

$14.99
$14.99
Write a Review
average rating 5.0 out of 5
Based on 1 review
  • 5 Stars
    1 Review
  • 4 Stars
    0 Reviews
  • 3 Stars
    0 Reviews
  • 2 Stars
    0 Reviews
  • 1 Star
    0 Reviews
100% of reviewers would recommend this product to a friend
Design
Rated 2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Fit
Rated 2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Runs Small, 0 is True to Size and 2 is Runs Large
Quality
Rated 2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Overall
Rated 2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
1 Review
Reviewed by Jesse O.
Verified Buyer
I recommend this product
Rated 5 out of 5
Review posted

Great

The boxers are great so far, the fabrics different than what I remember from last time but still good 👍

The packer was a little big for me so I didn't get too much practice with it but if it were smaller I'm sure it would've been great!

Loading...
Design
Rated 2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Fit
Rated 2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Runs Small, 0 is True to Size and 2 is Runs Large
Quality
Rated 2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Overall
Rated 2 on a scale of minus 2 to 2, where minus 2 is Meh, 0 is Good and 2 is Excellent
Was this helpful?